Bubble-cowries
A Review of the cruickshanki-group - Cypraeidae: Cypraeovula The fascinating deep water species of Cypraeovula, castanea, cruickshanki, connelli and iutsui have been subject of vast interest by various authors, some of whom went in detail by showing variations and proposing a couple of forma-names. The taxonomy has been debated up and down (especially that of castanea) and the standpoints were made more or less clear. Apparently these four species have, despite their rarity, demanded special interest amongst taxonomists and collectors.
This seems reason enought to have a look at the present state of knowledge on the shells of these beautiful creatures, whose only advantage from our attention is, that once in their lifes - at the very moment they reach the surface - they will see the sunlight.
The person who has done the most detailed study, and who posessed the largest variety of these rare deep water shells was W.E.J. Walles of Durban - a scratchy old genius whom to meet I had the pleasure in 1982. Despite the fact that he was certainly a weird, somewhat confused and extremely difficult personality, his bright intelligence and sense of humor made the day at his place unforgettable. For instance, he showed me a manuscript he had prepared, which was rejected by all magazines he offered it to. This paper contained (amongst other interesting and a lot of "strange" things) first descriptons and photos of the two iutsui variations from the Atlantic (which Walles had known and posessed long before anyone else). And it contained the description and several photos of a shell that is now universally known as connelli, including its variation connelli peelae (this name was morally but not legally introduced by Walles - the merit for peelae should have been given to him - at least I adopted the name when finally introducing the name in 2002.
This site shows a variety of shells of the four species mentioned, it tells my personal story on the subject. I do not claim to show the complete range of variation, but a good deal of it. The specimens belong to different people and some pictures where taken from other sources but my collection. They are abbreviated: (Bu): Burgess, (Ch): Chiapponi, (Ga): Gabrielli, (Li): Liltved, (Ta): Tarr
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, Paratype 2. |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, callous variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, lightweight variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, bulbous variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, peach coloured form |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, flanged, orange-brown specimen |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, irregularly flanged variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, northern variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, spotted variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula cruickshanki, blotched variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula sp. 1 |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli peelaeParatype 1 |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli peelae |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli peelae, holotype |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli peelae, spotted variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula sp. 3 ="Crossia kasiae" Walles 1980, holotype (invalid name, the paper was rejected by the publishers of the Venus magazine) |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli , holotype |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli peelae |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli peelae, intermediate variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli , typical |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli , rostrated variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula connelli , rostrated variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula colligata |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula kesslerorum |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula volvens |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , typical |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , typical, but smaller form |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , globular variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , brown toothed variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , giant variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , heavy form |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , heavy form |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , small globular variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula atlantica, typical |
![]() |
Cypraeovula atlantica, typical |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula atlantica, spotted variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , lightweight variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui , lightweight variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula levissima Paratype (Ch) |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula levissima |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula levissima |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula iutsui / castanea, intermediate |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, fresh specimens |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, fresh specimens |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, typical |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, typical |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, Cape Agulhas form - recently described as castanea malani |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, densely toothed deep water variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, densely toothed deep water variety |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea latebrosa |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea latebrosa intermediate form |
![]() |
![]() |
Cypraeovula castanea, globular deep water variety (Li) |
Discussion:
Many authors are making a distinction between the cruickshanki-group and other members of Cypraeovula. This is a difficult venture, especially when it goes as far as including iutsui to the group often called subgenus Crossia. This name was introduced by Shikama for iutsui. The group iutsui, cruickshanki, connelli at first glance appears well defined by the fact that all these are deep water shells with globular dorsal domes. It is possible to distinguish connelli and cruickshanki from all others by the defined fossula and the spiny teeth. On the other hand, iustui and castanea are so closely linked by their deep water form that it seems impossible to separate them on a higher level. Castanea again resembles other shallow water species such as fuscorubra and coronata. In my opinion, it would make more sense to separate connelli and cruickshanki in one subgenus, and castanea and iutsui in another. Finally, the recently described colligata and kesslerorum (possibly products of hybridism) link connelli with typical Cypraeovula conchologically. Molecular data confirms the recognition of the Crossia group against the other species of Cypraeovula at some level, but certainly not as subgenus.
First uploaded 2003, updated around 2005, 2012, and again July 2021