![]()
Is Naria leforti a valid species? The isolate Island of Rapa Nui, better known as Easter Island bears only few species of Cypraeidae: the elusive Cribrarula garciai, and three species in the genus Naria: caputdraconis, englerti and leforti. Latter was described as a subspecies of the widespread Naria cernica. The elusive garciai is so far known only from a small series of specimens collected in caves at Easter Island, whereas englerti and caputdraconis have also been found at Sala y Gomez, still further east towards the South American continent. The leforti has been collected alive in small numbers, I was fortunate enough to study most of the specimens that have been collected in the past years. Comparing the Easter Island population with all other populations of Naria cernica known to me I arrive at a point to question that considering leforti a mere subspecies of cernica is quite correct.
Naria cernica has one of the widest ranges of any known cowry. It is common in three areas, marked with yellow in the map:

1) the western Indian Ocean group: this is the typical cernica cernica. It is oval to deltoidal, inflated and yellow to orange dorsally. The aperture is rather widNaria It is common in depths around 20 to 30 m at Mauritius, occasionally it is found ex pisce in Natal and Southern Mozambique, few shells have been found at depth of 20-25 m in the Maldives, and a single shell was supposedly collected at 45 m on the submerged volcanic rock called Mount Vema, 600 km offshore the South African coast, in the Atlantic. (Nate 2021: This "record" turned out to be a made-up hoax of a notorious gangster whose inventiveness has caused considerable damage in due cause).
2) The Western Australian group: this area is inhabited by the subspecies cernica viridicolor. It is more depressed, deltoidal and callused, the dorsum is greenish or greyish orange rather than bright yellow. The aperture is a bit narrower. It lives between the intertidal zone to about 100 m.
3) The Pacific group: these populations were given different varietal (or subspecific) names: cernica ogasawarensis (Japan, Okinawa, the Philippines), cernica tomlini (Queensland, New Caledonia, Vanuatu), cernica kermadecensis (Kermadec Is. and New Zealand) and cernica marielae (Hawaii). The conchological differences between these four formae are inconsistent. Generally, the western Pacific populations have larger dorsal spotting and rather long teeth. Their distinction from the group 1 cernica cernica as Pacific subspecies is still under study, and likely to be possible on account of their zoogeography.
All three geographic groups share a large amount of common conchological features. Only the Western Australian viridicolor seems to maintain a certain degree of consistence to be maintained as a subspecies whereas generally, the various cernica-populations show the conchological variability of a single, widespread species. The only exception to this being leforti of Easter Island. First of all, the fusing anterior columellar teeth are a feature seldom encountered in CypraeidaNaria The finer, much shorter columellar teeth are another distinct feature not found in any of the cernica-populations. The dense marginal spotting is also found in some cernica, but in these it never forms distinct little tubercles as in leforti. Other characteristics such as the excessive amount of callus at the extremities and the margins are surely adaptations to the environment at Easter Island: excessive formation of callus is also an outstanding feature of Cribrarula garciai. The conchological distinctness of leforti, along with this geographic isolation does not seem to fit into the otherwise rather fluent and undefined variation-scheme of cernicNaria My personal view on leforti is therefore changed to considering it a valid species with a preliminary question-mark. The answer can be given by DNA studies, which will shortly be carried out on this fascinating and rare cowry.
Note 2021: The molecules barely support the separation of leforti as subspecies (see G3 Vol. 1 p. 241).
Many thanks to Bret and Michael